Celebrating 50 years of publishing a Radical Journal of Geography, 1969-2019

Symposium on Joel Wainwright and Geoff Mann’s ‘Climate Leviathan’ – Authors’ reply

Last month we launched a symposium on Joel Wainwright and Geoff Mann’s forthcoming Antipode paper, ‘Climate Leviathan’. The forum was structured like this: we made their paper open access; solicited four critical responses from fellow radical geographers; and opened the debate up to readers, who offered shorter commentaries. The process, we think, has been productive, with the threads that constitute ‘Climate Leviathan’ being thoroughly pulled and closely examined – not so much to unravel its thesis, as to spin it on or stitch it together in novel ways.

Here, we’re pleased to present Joel and Geoff’s reply to their interlocutors; it’s as constructive and engaged as the critiques which stimulated it.

Joel Wainwright and Geoff Mann, Solving for X: A reply to our critics

Thanks again to Joel, Geoff, and everyone who participated in the symposium.

*         *         *

We’ve often said that we want to become a forum where real dialogue happens as a matter of course, where colleagues/comrades feel comfortable discussing each others’ work, and we repeat that invitation now: If you’ve an idea for a symposium on work that’s innovative, provocative, ambitious, boundary pushing, or just plain radical, then please do get in touch.

9 comments on “Symposium on Joel Wainwright and Geoff Mann’s ‘Climate Leviathan’ – Authors’ reply

  1. Pingback: Symposium on Joel Wainwright and Geoff Mann’s ‘Climate Leviathan’ |

  2. Ben Wisner
    29 August 2012

    Wainwright and Mann’s Reply to Critics: Solving for X or Searching for the square root of minus 1?

    At Hanover, New Hampshire’s Wednesday farmers’ market this old geographer discovered a current collegiate fad: cupcakes. They’re half frosting and rainbow sprinkles. The cake below is moist and quite acceptable.

    The argument that Wainwright and Mann have winnowed down and present again as their reply to critics is quite acceptable: humanity is in a crisis (again); capitalism is to blame (as usual); perhaps THIS is the crisis the left has been waiting for since Marx gave flesh to the Hegelian dialectic; we don’t know how a global response to climate change will transform or even overthrow capitalism, so we’ll call this new world order ‘Climate X’.

    It’s just too bad that the solid and thought provoking argument continues to be sweetened with layers of philosophical confection.

    So with gratitude for the cake, but not the frosting, I want to respond to one point in the reply by W&M. Are those of us who wrote that W&M need to get more deeply into ‘the science’ and to think about ‘adaptation’ and not just reduction of green house gases guilty of ‘fetishising’ science and thus obscuring politics?

    My answer is ‘no’. Note that the examples of ‘adaptation’ W&M give are entirely from the US. What about small farmers, herders, fishers, forest workers and small town artisans who still make half of humanity? What is ‘adaptation’ to them? Where will the politics of their struggle to adapt lead? The point I made in my critique, based on my current work in Tanzania, is that such people are (a) currently struggling to ‘adapt’ their own livelihoods and land use (and some doing quite well, at least for now) and, most importantly, (b) are simultaneously struggling against land grabs, water grabs and many other scams that their government officials use to increase their power and wealth under the smokescreen of ‘climate change’. The implementation of the various National Adaptation Plans of Action (NAPAs) has opened new doors for corrupt elites.

    If W&M studied the geographic (hydrological, edaphic, botanical, etc.) and political ecological details of ‘adaptation’ in such situations, they would see why ‘Solving for X’ is more difficult than they think. The devil is in the detail, and since the devil — and his advocate — are mathematicians/ jokesters, this ‘X’ seems more like the Square root of minus one: ‘i’, the ‘imaginary’ number.

    THIS is what I meant by taking time off from reading 19th and early 20th Century philosophical classics and studying the science. Incidentally, my first two degrees were in philosophy. I know the charm and fascination of such language, but have also learned to be wary of hyperbole and metaphor and the many other ‘traps’ about which Wittgenstein cautions the thinker. Yet more caution needs to be exercised by those who would be thinker-activists.

    BEN WISNER — Founding editor of Antipode, curmudgeon, human being, independent scholar

  3. Pingback: Video abstract – ‘The Adaptative Nature of Neoliberalism at the Local Scale: Fifteen Years of City Improvement Districts in Cape Town and Johannesburg’ |

  4. Pingback: Symposium on the Participatory Geographies Research Group’s ‘Communifesto for Fuller Geographies: Towards Mutual Security’ |

  5. Pingback: Call for contributions – Forum on ‘Communifesto for Fuller Geographies: Towards Mutual Security’ |

  6. Pingback: Symposium on PyGyRG’s ‘Communifesto for Fuller Geographies’ – Authors’ reply to critical responses |

  7. Pingback: The Politics of Climate Change |

  8. Pingback: Symposium on PyGyRG’s ‘Communifesto for Fuller Geographies’ – Authors’ reply to critical responses |

What do you think? Here at we value readers' responses and encourage comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Archive by category

Interventions Interviews News Other Reviews Video Abstracts Virtual Issues

Archive by date

Journal content

Antipode - Wiley Online Library

Antipode Book Series

Antipode - Wiley Online Library

Twitter updates

Enter your e-mail address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

Join 17,146 other followers

Transparency notice

Click here to read about how we use and protect the personal data of Antipode’s authors and referees and those applying for Antipode Foundation grants and places at events we organise

%d bloggers like this: